[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev README.defines additions [patch]
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev README.defines additions [patch] |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 05:26:51 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Doug Kaufman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > > > +# -DEXP_PERSISTENT_COOKIES - Enable persistent cookie storage
> > >
> > > Not necessary to add this since it's handled by configure
> > > (although, somewhat inconsistently, some of those are listed.)
> >
> > I thouht that the whole point of README.defines was to document what
> > all the defines are for, making future development easier (and making
> > it easier for the platforms that don't use the configure mechanism).
>
> Yes, but there's such a long list of symbols set by configure that
yes (I didn't count, but seem to recall that there were a few hundred
symbols that affect the conditional compilation). Most of the interesting
ones (to me) are set in the configure script, so they're "listed" in
config.hin (but I prefer to keep the entries there concise for a number
of reasons).
> it seems pointless to list them all here. They are (or should be)
> all listed somewhere else already (INSTALLATION?). But if
> INSTALLATION is the canonical place for this, an explicit pointer
> to that file in README.defines would be in order. (And if not,
> maybe a pointer to config.hin, although that doesn't really give
> a clue what all the stuff is *for*).
>
> Just my opinion - if someone volunteers to maintain a comprehensive
> list in README.defines, all the better. But if not updated it would
> soon be out of synch with reality.
>
> Klaus
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: lynx-dev README.defines additions [patch],
dickey <=