[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?

From: Grant Edwards
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 19:05:18 -0000 (UTC)
User-agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)

On 2021-11-16, Simon Goldschmidt <goldsimon@gmx.de> wrote:

>>     sys_mbox_free() has to unblock receive tasks waiting on
>>     recvmbox/acceptmbox and prevent a task pending on this during/after
>>     deletion
>> Is that really required?
>> ...
> Yeah, well, that comment is outdated as well. Turned out that nearly no
> OS supports this, so it got implemented in a different way.

Cool, thanks. It looks like if I implement the sys-arch
per-thread-semaphore functions, I should be OK...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]