[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?
From: |
Grant Edwards |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:47:02 -0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) |
I've been reading up on netconn/sockets and thread-safety. At
https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/group__lwip__opts__netconn.html
it says this about the "fullduplex" option:
"ATTENTION: This is currently really alpha!"
Is that accurate?
That presumably applies to the socket api also?
One of the main industrial protocol stacks we want to run requires
thread-safe socket operations (read from one thread, write from
another), so lwIP stable may not be usable for that product. [I don't
know if "close from a third" is required or not.]
--
Grant
- [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?,
Grant Edwards <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Ajay Bhargav, 2021/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2021/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Grant Edwards, 2021/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2021/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Grant Edwards, 2021/11/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, address@hidden, 2021/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Grant Edwards, 2021/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2021/11/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Is netconn/socket fullduplex still "really alpha"?, Grant Edwards, 2021/11/17