[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question
From: |
odobryabov |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:54:47 -0700 (MST) |
Hi
Sylvain Rochet wrote
> Could you try replacing
>
> if (l2tp->iccn_retried >= PPPOL2TP_MAXICCN) {
> pppol2tp_abort_connect(l2tp);
> return;
> }
>
> by
>
> if (l2tp->iccn_retried >= PPPOL2TP_MAXICCN) {
> PPPDEBUG(LOG_DEBUG, ("pppol2tp: reached max ICCN"));
> l2tp->phase = PPPOL2TP_STATE_DATA;
> return;
> }
I tryed, but nothing changed. I put some debug below:
case PPPOL2TP_STATE_INITIAL:
PPPDEBUG(LOG_DEBUG, ("pppol2tp: timeout in PPPOL2TP_STATE_INITIAL\n"));
break;
case PPPOL2TP_STATE_DATA:
PPPDEBUG(LOG_DEBUG, ("pppol2tp: timeout in PPPOL2TP_STATE_DATA\n"));
break;
and it shows:
pppol2tp: timeout
pppol2tp: timeout in PPPOL2TP_STATE_DATA
--
View this message in context:
http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/lwip2-0-2-l2tp-question-tp30013p30102.html
Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/03
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/05
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/06
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/11
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip2.0.2 l2tp question, odobryabov, 2017/07/14