lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] Behavior of netif_set_link_down


From: Richner Simon
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Behavior of netif_set_link_down
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:31:03 +0200

Thanks for your help guys 

@ Marshall: Yes, you can check "NETIF_FLAG_LINK_UP", but this won't stop LwIP 
from sending, as <ip_route> checks "NETIF_FLAG_UP". So you must have a second 
mechanisme for this like Nikolas suggests...

@ Nikolas: So if I get you right, you would not activly stop the application 
from sending, but just return "ERR_CONN" in my driver send routine if the 
connection was down?

Regards
Simon


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden Im Auftrag von Marshall Brown
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Mai 2013 11:12
An: Mailing list for lwIP users
Betreff: Re: [lwip-users] Behavior of netif_set_link_down

Here's how I do mine 

                /* Call the PHY status update state machine once in a while
                   to keep the link status up-to-date */
                if (lpc_phy_sts_sm(netif_eth0) != 0) {
                        /* Set the state of the LED to on if the ethernet link 
is
                           active or off is disconnected. */
                        if (netif_eth0->flags & NETIF_FLAG_LINK_UP){
                                rtu_led_RequestLEDColour(LED_ALARM_PRIORITY_8, 
ALARM_CLEAR); //request a low level alarm for ethernet not connected we should 
be able to run without it
                        }
                        else{
                                rtu_led_RequestLEDColour(LED_ALARM_PRIORITY_8, 
ALARM_SET);      //request a low level alarm for ethernet not connected we 
should be able to run without it
                        }
                }


Courtesy of the internet somewhere

Regards
Marshall

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Nikolas Karakotas
Sent: Wednesday, 1 May 2013 9:02 p.m.
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Behavior of netif_set_link_down

I believe it has to do with your ethernet driver and how it is implemented.
Even if you send data to your hardware you should control this with a 
incrementer for example just like a round robin.

Regards,
Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Richner Simon
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:18 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: [lwip-users] Behavior of netif_set_link_down

Hi,

In my driver I call <netif_set_link_up> and <netif_set_link_down> when I detect 
that a cable was connected to / removed from my device. However, I noticed, 
that only setting the link up triggers <dhcp_network_changed> and not setting 
link down. So when a cable gets removed, the NETIF_FLAG_UP stays true.

In my application, I send some data periodically to a predefined IP.
When now the cable gets disconnected, the application doesn't get informed 
about this, neighter gets the netif set down. So my application continues to 
spam my hardware and sooner or later I get a buffer overflow on my hardware!

=> What is calling <netif_set_link_down> good for, when it doesn't bring the 
interface down?

=> What would be the best way to tell my application to stop streaming?



Best Regards
Simon

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users 


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]