[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release
|
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:48:57 +0100 |
Zayaz Volk <address@hidden> wrote:
> I meant of course the total UDP datagram size, not the number of IP
> packets inside.
That maximum size of a UDP datagram should only be limited by the protocol and
your resources, so 64K should work, yes.
Simon
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Mason, 2012/02/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, address@hidden, 2012/02/09
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Zayaz Volk, 2012/02/16
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, address@hidden, 2012/02/16
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Zayaz Volk, 2012/02/16
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Zayaz Volk, 2012/02/16
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Bill Auerbach, 2012/02/17
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Kieran Mansley, 2012/02/18
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release, Zayaz Volk, 2012/02/19
- [lwip-users] Fragmented datagrams, Mason, 2012/02/20