Re: [lwip-users] Fw: (no subject)

[address@hidden]

Kieran Mansley wrote:
> but I would also hope that 1.4.0 would perform as well if not better without 
> zero-copy.
I certainly would hope so, too. Although there have been fixes which 
might add some opcodes, I wouldn't have expected it to be noticably 
slower than 1.3.2...
> I think your packet captures have been held waiting for me to approve them as 
> the attachments are so large.  Perhaps you could get a smaller capture?  Or 
> upload them somewhere we can access them.  I don't really like forwarding many 
> megabytes to everyone on the mailing list.
>
> Being able to compare the 1.4.0 behaviour to the 1.3.0 behaviour would probably 
> help too.
Again, agreed. I'd love to have a look at comparable packet captures, 
but an excerpt of 10 or 20 seconds (in the range of 100KBytes, I guess?) 
might probably be enough to see a difference?

Simon