Re: [lwip-users] Reconnect issue

[Per Klint]

Kieran Mansley <kieran @recoil.org> wrote:
> SO_ REUSEADDR should be another way to avoid the problem.   
> If that's not working for you I would investigate that.
 
Yes and after Simons input on why it differs it sounds like 
SE_ REUSEADDR is the way forward. 
 
> Finally, you could also work around it by not repeatedly closing
> and re-opening the listening socket.  Just leave it open and 
> don't accept things (or even remove it from your select set) when
> you're not ready to handle another connection.
 
I tested that earlier and it worked... unfortunately this needs
some extra bytes of RAM and I don't have too much to play with.
We will have up to around 15 active TCP-connections in a small 
micro controller, so we need to be as greedy as we can on 
everything regarding RAM usage.
 
Thank you very much for your fast reply and input!
 
/// Per