[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Re: lwip-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 27
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Re: lwip-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 27 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:14:27 +0100 |
I'm afraid I don't understand your question. :-(
Simon
Li Eugene <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I think that was a typo and Kieran meant TCP_SND_BUF (the send queue limit
>> in bytes). You might have to change TCP_SND_QUEUELEN (the send queue limit
>> in pbufs), too.
> Simon,
>
> Could you explain why actual size of the queue is a half of what defined. For
> example #define TCP_WND 1536 than queue of pbufs will link up to 768 bytes.
>
> If request is longer than queue will link 768 bytes in pbufs however the rest
> of the request will be in pbufs just not linked?
>
> I've given up myself to resolve it - just wasting precious memory at the
> moment.
>
> Many thanks
> Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users