[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:35:53 +0100 |
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:30 +0200, Luis Rossi wrote:
> And how standard is the lwip compared to BSD sockets, i just looked at
> the
> file and functions and as example the accept function does not look
> alike
> the BSD accept funtion. Or am i missing something?
To use accept as an example: In sockets you would do something like call
accept() to wait for an accepted socket. It would block until a
connection arrived. In the lwIP raw API there is no way to wait for an
accepted socket. You just set the callback function to be called when a
new socket arrives using the tcp_accept() function. You application
therefore needs a very different structure as it is event driven rather
than synchronous.
Have a read of lwip/doc/rawapi.txt for more detail and example.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/15
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Kieran Mansley, 2010/10/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, address@hidden, 2010/10/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, m8847, 2010/10/17
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Kieran Mansley, 2010/10/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Kieran Mansley, 2010/10/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Luis Rossi, 2010/10/18
- Re: [lwip-users] Deatach LWIP Webserver, Kieran Mansley, 2010/10/19