Re: [lwip-users] Soliciting opinions for new FreeRTOS/lwIP demo

[FreeRTOS Info]

Hi Micael,

Thanks for the opinion.  I would be grateful for a copy of your
FreeRTOS/sockets code.  I've currently got my head stuck in some uIP
code but will be moving onto this soon and your code could be a good
head start.  You can send it to nospam [at] freertos [dot] org.  Thanks!

Regards,
Richard.

+ http://www.FreeRTOS.org
Designed for Microcontrollers.  More than 7000 downloads per month.

+ http://www.SafeRTOS.com
Certified by TÜV as meeting the requirements for safety related systems.




Micael wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> Having gone the route using lwip sockets with your FreeRTOS, I'd say stick 
> with sockets. Having said that, I realise that there are many reasons not to, 
> especially with lower performance cpus.
> 
> I also think, like Simon, that sockets in it self does not need a very 
> advanced demo, better focus on the initializations and startup. 
> However as for me, I had to struggle a bit to get all bits together, with the 
> demos currently available with FreeRTOS; the file structure is a bit 
> complicated if one are also using the fresher lwip from repository or any 
> newer release. If the FreeRTOS/lwip layers could be made more separated, or 
> layered somehow, it would be great. Currently I have bits and pieces from 
> lwip in FreeRTOS demo path, and other stuff from the 'current lwip' path. 
> 
> I still have the very complicated file strucutre in my project, but at some 
> time I'll have to deal with it. I am just not sure what is the best route, as 
> I'd like to follow updates from both lwip and FreeRTOS without a days work.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
>  Micael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>