|
From: | address@hidden |
Subject: | Re: [lwip-users] memp_malloc system protection |
Date: | Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:56:35 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Mike Kleshov wrote:
I didn't think anyone having thought this through like you did would ask such a question, so basically the answer is still "yes, the memp pools need protection"! If you know you are running in a system where there is no need for protection, the question wouldn't have arised...2009/11/27 address@hidden <address@hidden>:Yes, you should. That's what's SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT is meant to be for. SimonSurely it depends on the application. I'm using lwip raw API with no OS. I'm not using any concurrent access protection whatsoever. My interrupt service routines are small and simple, and they are not related to lwip in any way. Hence, no need for any protection.
Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |