[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:51:32 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:04 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> But is that really what we want (an bug free)? If so, we would really
> need a compile-time check that TCP_WND is at least 2*TCP_MSS (or only
> greater than TCP_MSS?) to prevent problems:
I think a compile time check would be a good idea.
> If, in Jan's case, the
> remote side was lwIP, too, the connection would stall as the window
> would never reopen because the remote side wouldn't be able to send a
> 2-byte-segment. I know we can fix this in lwIP, too, but there might
> be
> other embedded stacks having a problem with this?
I don't understand this new problem.
Kieran
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem, (continued)
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Bill Auerbach, 2009/10/20
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/10/21
- SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Jan Wester, 2009/10/21
- Re: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/10/21
- SV: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Jan Wester, 2009/10/21
- Re: SV: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, address@hidden, 2009/10/21
- Re: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, address@hidden, 2009/10/20
- Re: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/21
- Re: SV: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/21
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem, address@hidden, 2009/10/21
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/10/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/22
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Pettinato, Jim, 2009/10/22
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP problem, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/22