[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c
From: |
David Shmelzer |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:43:38 -0400 |
No, same thread. I just meant that I'm calling the netconn functions
from a separate thread from the lwip thread.
So I should not have mentioned that. However, the symptoms I am having
do seem to be as if the conn structure is being written to by another
thread. I just don't see it. I only have the one thread accessing the
netconn functions. If no one else has reported such behaviour it must be
my code. I'm stumped but I'll keep digging. I need to bring in a stump
remover.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Kieran Mansley
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:09 AM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:32 -0400, David Shmelzer wrote:
> I'm calling netconn_recv() in a loop in another thread with a zero
timeout.
> help?
Does that mean you're using the same connection from two different
threads? That would certainly explain the problem. It's not supported
I'm afraid.
Kieran
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
- [lwip-users] sys_arch_mbox_fetch() peek, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/05
- Re: [lwip-users] sys_arch_mbox_fetch() peek, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/10/06
- [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/06
- Re: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/07
- RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c,
David Shmelzer <=
- RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/07
- RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c, Kieran Mansley, 2009/10/08
- RE: [lwip-users] conn->err = ERR_CLSD in api_lib.c, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/13
- [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/13
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, David Empson, 2009/10/13
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/14
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, Bill Auerbach, 2009/10/14
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/15
- SV: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, Jan Wester, 2009/10/16
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP payload is doubled, David Shmelzer, 2009/10/16