|
From: | frederic.bernon |
Subject: | Re: [lwip-users] link down and netconn problem |
Date: | Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:31:21 +0200 (CEST) |
I will try to find the IRC log about this discussion to know the reasons (it should be in my home computer). I know it was in "[task #6969] Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer" if it can help...
> Message du 07/10/09 11:56
> De : "Simon Goldschmidt"
> A : "Mailing list for lwIP users"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [lwip-users] link down and netconn problem
>
>
> > I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a good
> > case for it. Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL macro
> > so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that no one
> > does!
>
> That was after a discussion with Frédéric, who did not agree that no errors are fatal. I think before that, we did not have non-fatal errors at all (meaning there were checkes for conn->err == ERR_OK at some places) and as I did not convince him, we added the 'fatal' check as a consensus. However, I'm still not totally satisfied with this solution...
>
> Simon
> --
> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
Gratuite, garantie à vie et déjà utilisée par des millions d'internautes... |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |