Re: [lwip-users] Re: tx badnwidth

[Kieran Mansley]

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 18:14 +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> Kieran Mansley wrote:
> > You can probably get away with leaving TCP_WND alone
> > if you're acting purely as a sender of packets,
> In fact, I think you won't, as TCP_WND is not only the announced receive 
> window size but serves as a limit for transmit window, too.

I thought that sounded familiar and had a look for it in the source
before posting, but couldn't find where this happened.  Can you remind
me?

Thanks

Kieran