[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:58:00 +0100 |
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 08:58 -0400, bill wrote:
> TCP checksum (which we in the end disabled because we are always on an
> internal lan)
I hope you're not transferring any important data over this connection.
I would not trust any network to get the bits right all the time. It
would be fine for a large class of applications (e.g. where the data has
no persistence when it arrives, or for those that would often use UDP)
but a really bad idea for others.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, Gary Olson, 2008/10/10
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, Rishi Khan, 2008/10/11
- RE: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, bill, 2008/10/13
- RE: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, address@hidden, 2008/10/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, Timmy Brolin, 2008/10/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, Jonathan Larmour, 2008/10/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, rishi, 2008/10/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Try to Increase Jumbo Packet size beyond 9K, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/15