lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass


From: Ed Sutter
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:26:54 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Ok, I've spoken to a few folks off-line about this, and have narrowed it
down a bit further.  There's either a bug or I'm not configuring something
properly...

I'm running LWIP 1.3.0 on a Blackfin, which is picky about accessing longs
on long-word boundaries.  I have MEM_ALIGNMENT set to 4.  My network generates
occasional fragmented IP packets, and it causes the function
ip_reass_chain_frag_into_datagram_and_validate() to crash.

Here's the flow...
The packet is received and buffered up using pbuf_alloc() (with each payload
aligned on a 4-byte boundary) then that set of pbufs is passed to 
ethernet_input().
The ethernet_input() function then sees that it is IP, increments the payload
pointer by 14 (size of ethernet header) and passes the pbufs to ip_input().
Note that at this point, the payload pointer is no longer aligned on a 4-byte
boundary because the original 4-byte-aligned payload pointer is incremented
by 14.

Next, ip_input() sees that the packet is a fragment, so it calls ip_reass()
which then calls ip_reass_chain_frag_into_datagram_and_validate().  About 15
lines from the top, this function overlays a "helper" structure pointer on
the payload area (which is no longer 4-byte aligned).  The helper structure's
first member is a pointer which is initialized to NULL, this causes the crash
because loading the pointer is a 4-byte-wide access, but the pointer is not on
a 4-byte aligned address.

This is only seen on an alignment-sensitive processor when an fragment is
received.  I made a simple change to the helper structure to fix this (see
below); however, I would like to make sure that there isn't some other
configuration parameter that I should be setting to avoid this.

I changed this...

   struct ip_reass_helper {
     struct pbuf *next_pbuf;    <<<< this member access is not aligned
     u16_t start;
     u16_t end;
   };

to this...

   struct ip_reass_helper {
       PACK_STRUCT_FIELD(u16_t start);
       PACK_STRUCT_FIELD(struct pbuf *next_pbuf);    <<<< now it is
       PACK_STRUCT_FIELD(u16_t end);
     };

and my crash has disappeared.  Putting the 'start' member above the next_pbuf
pointer will naturally align the pointer, which as far as I can tell will
always be mis-aligned by 2 bytes when MEM_ALIGNMENT is set to 4.

Is this a valid fix or am I just configuring something incorrectly to cause
this crash?

Sorry for the verbosity!
Ed


Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Ed Sutter wrote:
Hey folks,,
I'm using 1.3.0, been running fine for quite a while now.
I just crashed somewhere in ip_reass() as a result of an
incoming IP fragment (MF bit set in header).  Are there any
known problems with IP_REASSEMBLY in lwip1.3.0?

I know of an issue with fragmentation, but not reassembly:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6528

If anything the discussion there shows that reassembly should work.

Jifl




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]