[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites)
From: |
Bill Auerbach |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:24:20 -0500 |
I see I can use TCP_WRITE_FLAG_COPY with tcp_write when the data is dynamic.
There won't be a lot to copy. It's not very efficient but the problem is
solvable.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
> Of Bill Auerbach
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: 'Mailing list for lwIP users'
> Subject: RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing
> TCPwrites)
>
> Jonathan,
>
> While debugging this, I found a much more serious problem to now deal
> with.
> Once resolved, I'll continue on the original problem because I don't want
> to
> have this new problem be causing the original.
>
> In my tcp_sent callback, I see that I have no remaining data to send. It
> was recommended that this is the time that I can deallocate the memory
> passed to tcp_write (because presumably it's been sent). The problem is,
> this data is still in the send queue and cannot be deallocated at this
> time.
> The data cannot be deallocated until it is ACKed, which I have no way of
> knowing (I think).
>
> This makes me wonder, how is anyone handling calling tcp_write with
> dynamically allocated memory and freeing it at the time when it is safe
> to?
>
> Do I really need a custom version that tracks segments that have dynamic
> memory, sees the ACK and then frees those that are marked dynamic? Or as
> I've done in the past, have I made this a much bigger problem than is
> really
> there?
>
> Thank you,
> Bill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I can only assume that your subsequent tcp_writes are not matching the
> > 'if'
> > condition. Maybe you could debug it (or add a little print statement) to
> > find out why. It is possible there may be a bug around.
> >
> > Jifl
> > --
> > eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos
> experts
> > ** Visit us at ESC Silicon Valley <http://www.embedded.com/esc/sv> **
> > ** April 15-17 2008, Booth 3012, San Jose McEnery Convention Center **
> > Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223
> 245571
> > Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
> > ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------
> Opinions==mine
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
- Re: [lwip-users] Optimizing TCP writes, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] Optimizing TCP writes, Jonathan Larmour, 2008/03/06
- RE: [lwip-users] Optimizing TCP writes, Bill Auerbach, 2008/03/06
- Re: [lwip-users] Optimizing TCP writes, Jonathan Larmour, 2008/03/06
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCP writes), Bill Auerbach, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCP writes), Kieran Mansley, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites), Bill Auerbach, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites), Kieran Mansley, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites), Bill Auerbach, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites), Kieran Mansley, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: OptimizingTCPwrites), Bill Auerbach, 2008/03/07
- RE: [lwip-users] tcp_write and dynamic data (was: Optimizing TCPwrites),
Bill Auerbach <=