[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE : [lwip-users] 1.2.0 etharp_ip_input change
From: |
Frédéric BERNON |
Subject: |
RE : [lwip-users] 1.2.0 etharp_ip_input change |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:25:08 +0100 |
Hi Jonathan,
It seems there is a problem to download your patch from
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?5657>
Can you please send me the diff file please?
====================================
Frédéric BERNON
HYMATOM SA
Chef de projet informatique
Microsoft Certified Professional
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44
Email : address@hidden
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Jonathan Larmour
Envoyé : mercredi 3 janvier 2007 16:49
À : Mailing list for lwIP users
Objet : Re: [lwip-users] 1.2.0 etharp_ip_input change
Kieran Mansley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 17:50 +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> I was wondering about the following change in 1.2.0. Isn't updating
>> the ARP
>> table from incoming IP packets a good thing and normal practice? Otherwise
>> for something which isn't already in the ARP cache (especially a new TCP
>> connection, or UDP from a novel host) won't the lwip stack need to send an
>> ARP request for any response?
>
> There is a moderate spoofing problem with that approach, as you
> essentially take it as given that the person who sent you the packet
> isn't lying about their MAC address. By always checking it (by
> sending a broadcast ARP request) you give yourself at least a little
> protection from such things.
Very little indeed, unfortunately, unless it was by accident, not
intentionally.
> Whether the efficiency of avoiding the ARP outweighs
> the paranoia of always checking is perhaps up to the local network
> manager, and we should perhaps consider it as a compile time option.
I'll submit a patch for this then.
Jifl
--
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf
- RE : [lwip-users] 1.2.0 etharp_ip_input change,
Frédéric BERNON <=