[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
Andreas Becker |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:56:44 +0200 |
> I thought that the stack should, if asked to send an ACK when one has
> already been delayed, send a dedicated packet out at that point. i.e.
> There should only be one outstanding delayed acknowledgement at once.
Wei Bo-Er,
how big is your TCP-WND (TCP-Window)?
So is the sending host able to send an second frame without waiting for the
first frame to be acked?
hope this helps.
--
Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Becker
Entwicklung
dSys e.K.
Soeflinger Str. 100
D-89077 Ulm
Tel: +49.731.151579-1
Fax: +49.731.151579-9
web: www.dsys.de
- [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/10
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11