[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] htons VS HTONS (Fw: MALLOC vs. malloc: maybe use __builtin
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] htons VS HTONS (Fw: MALLOC vs. malloc: maybe use __builtin_constant_p?) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:20:03 +0200 |
Hello,
the NetBSD mailing list discussed a similar issue to what we recently
discussed about: The compile-time evaluation of the htons() functions
which would be nice if they evaluate as macro's if the argument is a
constant.
I'll try to see if they found a nice solution for it.
Leon.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Thorpe" <address@hidden>
Newsgroups: netbsd.tech.kern
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: MALLOC vs. malloc: maybe use __builtin_constant_p?
>
> On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 07:14 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
> > Maybe "The Right Thing" is to have a single blessed version, which uses
> > __builtin_constant_p() to check whether the arg is a constant, and
> > evaluates into the macro or the fn based on that...
>
> Yah, that's a pretty good idea...
>
> I'll take a look while I'm on the plane Wednesday...
>
> -- Jason R. Thorpe <address@hidden>
>
- [lwip-users] htons VS HTONS (Fw: MALLOC vs. malloc: maybe use __builtin_constant_p?),
Leon Woestenberg <=
- [lwip-users] FTP/TFTP Port!!, manjunath, 2003/04/09