lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] Re: lightweight protection


From: Kieran Mansley
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Re: lightweight protection
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:24:51 +0000 (GMT)

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Marc Boucher wrote:
> Locks should only be held or interrupts blocked during the least possible
> time required to manipulate shared data and avoid races..

In general, yes, but there is a trade off with the overhead it takes to
acquire or free a lock.  ie. If you are continually taking and releasing
locks in a tight loop to avoid holding the lock over a piece of code that
doesn't require it, you will find you're spending all of your time on the
locking.

Kieran





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]