[lwip-devel] [task #14314] Implement interface name/index APIs

[Joel Cunningham]

Follow-up Comment #15, task #14314 (project lwip):

David,

So you are currently experience overflow in your use case and want to resolve
it in your init callback, by possibly doing the O(n^2) walking of the netifs?

I did understand what you were saying, but thought Dirk's guidance was that
cases where netif_num overflows are not supported.  The proposed change would
give an allowance to overflow cases, but only if handled by the netif driver

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?14314>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/