Re: [lwip-devel] netif->flags: u8_t -> u16_t ?

[address@hidden]

I forgot to add:

> I'm trying to do some further work on IPv6.

Cool! Although our marketing guys can't seem to generate a need for IPv6 
among our customers, I really appreciate your work on this!

> Also, agree with Simon on IPv6 being optional. Although there has 
also been a request for
> IPv4 be made optional and I can see use cases for this, especially 
considering 6LowPAN WSNs
> (which I'm working on right now)

I think when it comes to a single-version stack, one is as good as the 
other and we should support both. In fact, there is already a bug 
tracker entry for this.


Simon