lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [patch #8360] Speed up the acquisition of SLAAC addresses


From: Philip Gladstone
Subject: [lwip-devel] [patch #8360] Speed up the acquisition of SLAAC addresses
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:21:10 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.107 Safari/537.36

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?8360>

                 Summary: Speed up the acquisition of SLAAC addresses
                 Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
            Submitted by: pjsg
            Submitted on: Wed 26 Feb 2014 01:21:09 PM GMT
                Category: IPv6
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

It turns out (that on my system at least) that SLAAC addresses take a long
time to be assigned. This is because the SLAAC addresses only get assigned on
receipt of a RA. The lwip stack tries to send RS messages to solicit the RA,
but none of them are actually transmitted due to network bringup timings.

This patch only decrements the RS retransmission count *if* the RS is actually
sent.



    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 26 Feb 2014 01:21:09 PM GMT  Name: resilient-rs.patch  Size: 2kB  
By: pjsg

<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/download.php?file_id=30709>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?8360>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]