[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex
From: |
Mike Kleshov |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:53:33 +0400 |
On 23 November 2011 15:11, Mason <address@hidden> wrote:
> cf. also
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/browse_frm/thread/f9fe040cffd1ea6e
>
> (A few experts hang out in comp.lang.c and comp.std.c)
Thanks for the suggestion to look at comp.lang.c. A quick search
pointed me to two interesting threads:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/browse_thread/thread/9b562a4bb657ee8d/5975d5d43d33a914
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_thread/thread/cdfa182d6bf27ce3/a23d05b62d198a20
In short, they support my view that it's simply the vague wording of
the standard that threw me off. The people that wrote the
corresponding posts (Richard Heathfield, Peter Seebach) seem to know
what they are talking about.
Regards,
- mike
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Mike Kleshov, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Mason, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Mike Kleshov, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Mason, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, David Brown, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Mike Kleshov, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/11/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, David Brown, 2011/11/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/11/24
Re: [lwip-devel] LWIP_U32_DIFF is unnecessarily complex,
Mike Kleshov <=