[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] Re: lwip-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 4
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] Re: lwip-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 4 |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:40:00 +0100 |
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:45 +0800, edgar wrote:
> The problem just is that: if tcpip_thread received message very fast,
> waitting case would not occur while fetching from mbox,
> then expire would be enlarged,
OK, I think I see what you're saying - we might not process timeout
handlers appropriately.
Simon: sys_mbox_post() has gone from CVS head I think. Has this problem
gone too, or just moved into the ports? Edgar: it would help if you
could update to the current CVS code and see if your problem is already
solved as this code has changed since the last release.
> tcp_slowtmr called every 500ms is not true any more.
That shouldn't happen. How are you arranging to call tcp_tmr()?
Kieran