[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-devel] [patch #6521] lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit computers
From: |
Grubb, Jared |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-devel] [patch #6521] lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit computers |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:19:58 -0800 |
For u8_t, %d is right.
For size_t.... good question. You might need a #define after all, since its
going to be either unsigned or unsigned long (and maybe it's possible to be
something else? But I would bet even though its not guaranteed by the standard
you wouldn’t actually ever find anything but one of these two values)...
Jared
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:lwip-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Simon
> Goldschmidt
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:49 AM
> To: Simon Goldschmidt; Kieran Mansley; Jonathan Larmour; Rishi Khan;
> address@hidden
> Subject: [lwip-devel] [patch #6521] lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit
> computers
>
>
> Update of patch #6521 (project lwip):
>
> Status: None => In Progress
> Assigned to: None => goldsimon
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Follow-up Comment #4:
>
> Looking through this, what's the suggested format string for
> a) size_t
> b) u8_t
> ? I guess for size_t we need a new define. Is %d OK for u8_t?
>
> Apart from that, I've had a look through the patch: most of the changes
> are
> just wrong, but there *are* many places that need attention. I'm in the
> middle
> of this but it will take some days until I find time for it again.
>
> Oh, and does anybody know if there any good compiler setting to warn me
> about
> wrong format arguments? I don't want to search the whole code...
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
> <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6521>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel