On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:42 +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Kieran Mansley wrote:
So, this is a call for lwip developers to step forward if:
- they already maintain a port (so that we know someone is doing the
job and don't retire it)
- they don't already maintain a port, but would like to help out by
doing so in order to prevent a port being retired.
I think the eCos RTOS port in lwip should be retired because the canonical
code for that actually resides in the public eCos repository.
OK, thanks for the info, seems like that would be sensible.
Kieran
_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel