[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream
From: |
Stuart Hughes |
Subject: |
Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:50:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the info. Hopefully the maintainers of this BSP platform
will be able to get your work integrated.
Regards, Stuart
On 25/10/11 13:28, address@hidden wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> Bear in mind base_libs was tested against toolchains from CS that are in
>> LTIB. This is newer and if they've changed the way they build/package their
>> toolchains base_libs.spec will need adjusting.
>
> The main reason I am updating the compiler is because when building my
> current 3.2 kernel the compile prints out a message saying that the
> old compiler is known to be broken for building the kernel.
>
>
>>
>> As I've said many times, right now I have no time to work out on this, all I
>> can offer is a bit of informal email advice.
>>
>> Regards, Stuart
>>
>> On 24/10/11 18:31, address@hidden wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Wells<address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Stuart,
>>>>
>>>> You want to push that patch in? I somehow missed the custom toolchain
>>>> option, but the custom toolchain arguments options is there. Must have been
>>>> one of those days. I'll check the others to see if any more are missing
>>>> that.
>>>
>>> It is copying a relative symlink:
>>> address@hidden:/home/apps/ltib$ ls
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/libgcc_s* -l
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 135 2011-09-29 02:56
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/libgcc_s.so
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2011-09-29 03:03
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/libgcc_s.so.1 ->
>>> ../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
>>>
>>> Which doesn't work after it is copied.
>>>
>>>
>>> I did a ./ltib -m distclean
>>> picked ea3131, path /usr, prefix arm-linux-gnueabi-
>>>
>>> + cp -dp /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/libgcc_s.so
>>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/libgcc_s.so.1
>>> /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/lib/
>>> + set -e
>>> + perl -w -e
>>> @ARGV = grep { `file $_` =~ m,ASCII C program text, } @ARGV;
>>> exit(0) unless @ARGV;
>>> $^I = ".bak";
>>> while(<>) {
>>> s,[\S/]+/,,g if m,^GROUP,;
>>> print;
>>> }
>>> /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/lib/libc.so
>>> /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/lib/libpthread.so
>>> /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/usr/lib/libc.so
>>>
>>> /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/usr/lib/libpthread.so
>>> + cd /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm
>>> + find /home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/lib
>>> + xargs chmod 755
>>> chmod: cannot operate on dangling symlink
>>>
>>> `/home/apps/ltib/tmp/base_libs//opt/freescale/rootfs/arm/lib/libgcc_s.so.1'
>>> error: Bad exit status from /home/apps/ltib/tmp/rpm-tmp.59841 (%install)
>>>
>>>
>>> RPM build errors:
>>> Bad exit status from /home/apps/ltib/tmp/rpm-tmp.59841 (%install)
>>> Build time for base_libs: 1 seconds
>>>
>>> Failed building base_libs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Kevin
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: address@hidden
>>>> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Stuart
>>>> Hughes
>>>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:08 AM
>>>> To: address@hidden
>>>> Cc: address@hidden
>>>> Subject: Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream
>>>>
>>>> On 23/10/11 17:07, address@hidden wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, address@hidden<address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Hughes<address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This stuff is processed in config/userspace/toolchain.lkc which should
>>>>>>> be included in the BSP's config/platform/_target_/main.lkc file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe whoever made this platform forgot to add it into the list of
>>>>>>> toolchains for that platform? Which platform do you have selected?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Embedded Artists board with the NXP LPC3131
>>>>>
>>>>> The EA config files are not using the support in config/userspace
>>>>>
>>>> Not sure why they missed that in their BSP config. If it's the one I
>>>> think you mean, you could try adding this patch:
>>>>
>>>> cvs diff: Diffing config/platform/ea3131
>>>> Index: config/platform/ea3131/main.lkc
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> RCS file: /sources/ltib/ltib/config/platform/ea3131/main.lkc,v
>>>> retrieving revision 1.4
>>>> diff -u -r1.4 main.lkc
>>>> --- config/platform/ea3131/main.lkc 19 Apr 2010 20:28:12 -0000 1.4
>>>> +++ config/platform/ea3131/main.lkc 24 Oct 2011 08:06:55 -0000
>>>> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
>>>>
>>>> config TOOLCHAIN1
>>>> bool "gcc-3.4.5-glibc-2.3.6 (soft-float)" if GLIBC
>>>> +
>>>> + config TOOLCHAIN_CUSTOM
>>>> + bool "custom"
>>>> +
>>>> endchoice
>>>>
>>>> config TOOLCHAIN
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Stuart
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>
>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>
>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, (continued)
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, address@hidden, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, address@hidden, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Stuart Hughes, 2011/10/30
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Stuart Hughes, 2011/10/30
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Stuart Hughes, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, address@hidden, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream,
Stuart Hughes <=
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Stuart Hughes, 2011/10/25
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Stuart Hughes, 2011/10/30
- Re: [Ltib] Security fixes and merging changes upstream, Kevin Wells, 2011/10/31