[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ltib] busybox 1.19.2 fails to compile mtd-utils
From: |
Lambrecht Jürgen |
Subject: |
Re: [Ltib] busybox 1.19.2 fails to compile mtd-utils |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:47:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 10/11/2011 10:15 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
>
> On 11/10/11 09:08, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> > On 11/10/11 07:49, Lambrecht Jürgen wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2011 02:02 PM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> >>> Hi Jurgen,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the patches, I've uploaded the content to the GPP and
> >>> updated
> >>> CVS.
> >>>
> >> Stuart, when trying to unpack busybox (for bug in udhcpc), I got an md5
> >> checksum error on the patch when downloading it from the GPP.
> >> In attachment the md5 checksum that works for me.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Jürgen
> >>
> >> P.S.: soon a second busybox patch
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >
> > Hi Jurgen,
> >
> > The issue is that somewhere along the process of saving the attachment
> > and uploading it, the encoding of the author got messed up (UTF-8).
> >
> > Because you already had the named file, ltib downloaded the md5 file
> > for the (modified) file and they didn't match.
> >
> > What I need to do is to re-upload the file once I figure out where the
> > corruption occurred. I will use a new name
> > busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h-1.patch to avoid any issues with people who
> > have already downloaded this version with the bad author encoding
> > (which will nonetheless be functional).
> >
> > For now you can move your
> > /opt/ltib/pkgs/busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch out the way so that you
> > don't get an error on download.
> >
> > Regards, Stuart
> >
>
> Hi Jurgen,
>
> I just checked again and the copy on the GPP (file and md5) seem to be
> correct. The file has been UTF-8 encoded to take account of the author
> name.
>
> Can you check your local copy that is giving the error to see if you can
> see what the difference is.
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
Sorry Stuart, my mistake. The files are indeed OK:
Processing: busybox-1.19.2
============================
Build path taken because: spec file newer than rpm,
Testing network connectivity for gpp
OK GPP: is available
Try busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch.md5 from the GPP
16:41:53
URL:http://bitshrine.org/gpp/busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch.md5 [65/65]
-> "busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch.md5" [1]
Try busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch from the GPP
16:41:53 URL:http://bitshrine.org/gpp/busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch
[16684/16684] -> "busybox-1.19.2-ubi-user-h.patch" [1]
Regards,
Jürgen