Re: [Ltib] linux kernel tarball versions

[Jürgen Lambrecht]

On 03/03/2011 09:37 PM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> Hi Jurgen,
>
> There's no trial and error, unless there a reference from a .spec file,
> then it doesn't (officially) exist in LTIB.
OK, I didn't know. So just 'll dist/lfs-5.1/kernel/'.
> To tell if something is referenced, run ./ltib -m config and look at the
> available kernels.  If it's not there, it will need to be added.
>
> For this Freescale platform, it's work asking what they have in their
> latest BSPs and encourage them to push out what they have to the public
> LTIB project.
They don't work on the imx27pdk anymore.
I will try to submit it to ltib.
> Regards, Stuart
>
>
> On 03/03/11 13:46, Jürgen Lambrecht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to upgrade to linux kernel v2.6.35.? for my imx27pdk; it is
> > now at 2.6.22.
> >
> > With trial and error, I found that linux-2.6.35.tar.bz2 is not available
> > from http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/, the latest is I think
> > linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2.
> > Is there a better way that trial and error?
> >
> > I also want to commit the imx27pdk platform port to 2.6.35 back to
> > LTIB-Savanah, but I guess then that linux tarball should be in the GPP?
> >
> > I selected kernel version 2.6.35 because linux-imx uses that stable
> > version (2.6.35.3 is the latest tag) and also LFS uses that version
> > (2.6.35.4 according to wikipedia))
> > On kernel.org, 2.6.35.11 is the longterm stable.
> > But the linux stable of 2.6.35 is 2.6.35.9 - I would expect the longterm
> > to have a lower number than the stable?
> > (maybe with "longterm" they mean a "stable" one selected also for
> > longterm support?)
> > But, I guess I should go for 2.6.35.11?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Jürgen


--
Jürgen Lambrecht
R&D Associate
Tel: +32 (0)51 303045    Fax: +32 (0)51 310670
http://www.televic-rail.com
Televic Rail NV - Leo Bekaertlaan 1 - 8870 Izegem - Belgium
Company number 0825.539.581 - RPR Kortrijk