[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Does doxygen's client-side search work?
From: |
Vadim Zeitlin |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Does doxygen's client-side search work? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:44:27 +0200 |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:36:20 +0000 Greg Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
GC> Me, I don't think I ever even noticed that doxygen had a search
GC> facility: if I wanted to look up "wxMenuBar", I already knew its name.
Sure, but if you wanted to use a progress indicator, you might not know
that it's called wxGauge (in fact I have no idea why is it called this
neither, maybe it's a Britishism?), but searching for "progress" will still
find it (together with many, many other things, unfortunately).
GC> A comprehensive understanding of lmi's premium-tax implementation
GC> is still most easily gotten by reading the source code. For example,
GC> free function premium_tax_is_retaliatory() is documented here:
GC>
GC>
https://www.nongnu.org/lmi/doxygen/namespaceanonymous__namespace_02premium__tax_8cpp_03.html#a86bc15cf098e8bc8049f457da76ed861
GC>
GC> but that's not linked to the documentation for class premium_tax,
GC> AFAICS.
You could always add "@see premium_tax" to the documentation of this
function (or "\see" if you prefer TeX to Java) or just mention this class
in its documentation and rely on auto-linking (which is probably more
palatable).
Regards,
VZ
pgpRn2PZMIeW5.pgp
Description: PGP signature