[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++ |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:47:11 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 |
On 10/5/22 17:38, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:45:48 +0000 Greg Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
> GC> This problem is observed in the presence of llvm libunwind,
> GC> but not observed in its absence (i.e., with HP libunwind).
> GC> That's all I know.
>
> Please let me know if you'd like me to try to reproduce this and
> understand what happens there. I won't do it immediately because, perhaps,
> it's not really necessary if using pragmas provides a satisfactory
> solution/workaround.
My casual opinion is that it's unnecessary. The libstdc++ <regex>
library apparently is not UBSAN-clean, or UBSAN just doesn't work
perfectly with gcc; either way, the presence or absence of error
messages may be aligned with random circumstances beyond our
control.
And using a pragma does work. You could see that in the two small
commits that I just attempted to push, except for this problem:
sr #110737: git push rejected
https://savannah.nongnu.org/support/index.php?110737
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/04
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/04
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/04
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/05
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/05
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/05
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/05
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/05
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/06
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/06
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/06
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/06
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Vadim Zeitlin, 2022/10/06
- Re: [lmi] LLVM libc++, Greg Chicares, 2022/10/06