Re: [lmi] Branch lmi-so

[Greg Chicares]

On 10/18/20 2:55 PM, Greg Chicares wrote:
> [...some github branch already applied...]
>> This branch generally moves "LMI_SO" to the left

A new question arises: if "inline" and "LMI_SO" compete for
leftmost position, which wins? I think it should be "LMI_SO":
  LMI_SO inline double foo() {return 3.14;} // This way.
  inline LMI_SO double foo() {return 3.14;} // No, not this way.

For completeness, I should ask whether "LMI_SO" should be
written to the left of "static" and "constexpr". I think the
answer will be that only "template<whatever>" and "class" can
take the leftmost position away from "LMI_SO". Thus:
  template<typename T> LMI_SO static constexpr inline foo<T>(T t) {...}