[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Benchmarking: gcc-8 beats gcc-10 soundly?
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Benchmarking: gcc-8 beats gcc-10 soundly? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:23:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 2020-09-21 12:15, Greg Chicares wrote:
[...]
> Thus, we can confidently upgrade to gcc-10: it passes our
> full nychthemeral test suite, and it's a negligible half
> of a percent slower.
That message should have stated that the binaries (built
with both compilers) used current 'master' (6a05bcee)
with no change to any code or makefiles. Thus, they used
the same compiler flags, with the exception of these:
ifneq (,$(filter $(gcc_version), 10.0))
gcc_cxx_warnings += -Wredundant-tags -Wvolatile
endif
which merely inhibit new gcc-10 warnings.
Re: [lmi] Benchmarking: gcc-8 beats gcc-10 soundly?, Greg Chicares, 2020/09/20