[lmi] Anomalies indicated by 'rate_table_tool'

[Greg Chicares]

Vadim--I'm not sure which is anomalous, the table or the data, but
please try this test case...

$wget download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/lmi/lmi-data-20050618T1440Z.tar.bz2
$tar -xjvf lmi-data-20050618T1440Z.tar.bz2
$wine /opt/lmi/bin/rate_table_tool.exe -a --verify --file=data/sample          

Observed output:

---------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<-------
Table #2 specifies 7 decimals, but 8 were necessary.
This flaw has been corrected, and the CRC recalculated.
[rate_table.cpp : 1865]

Table #3 specifies 7 decimals, but 8 were necessary.
This flaw has been corrected, and the CRC recalculated.
[rate_table.cpp : 1865]

Table #6 specifies 7 decimals, but 6 were necessary.
This flaw has been corrected, and the CRC recalculated.
[rate_table.cpp : 1865]

Table #8 specifies 5 decimals, but 2 were necessary.
This flaw has been corrected, and the CRC recalculated.
[rate_table.cpp : 1865]

Table #10 specifies 8 decimals, but 17 were necessary.
This flaw has been corrected, and the CRC recalculated.
[rate_table.cpp : 1865]

Verification failed for table #10: After loading and saving the original table 
binary contents differed.

[rate_table_tool.cpp : 361]
--------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------

I'm not too worried about:
  Table #10 specifies 8 decimals, but 17 were necessary.
because decimals here are more like children than phalanges in that
you don't really need seventeen of them. But the other tables look
okay to me.