Re: [lmi] Special "split funds" supplemental report

[Greg Chicares]

On 2019-01-22 23:30, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2019-01-21 21:46, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
[...]
>>  Out of curiosity, is "split funds" the same as "split fund allocation"?
>> I'm asking this because I see that in ledger_variant_init.cpp the
>> apparently related field SplitFundAllocation is set to true if either this
>> condition or if "0.0 != GenAcctAllocation && 1.0 != GenAcctAllocation" one
>> is true? Possibly more importantly, should I use exactly the condition
>> above or test SplitFundAllocation in the code that we will write to
>> generate this report?
[...]
> Yes, this field should now be used for its originally contemplated purpose.
> 
> I'll double check this enhanced Circumstance once we've recovered from the
> latest ice storm, but I think we'll decide it's the One True Circumstance.

It has been so decided: 'SplitFundAllocation' is the One True Circumstance
that determines whether or not this special report should be incorporated.