lmi
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] Mustache template groupings


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: Re: [lmi] Mustache template groupings
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:01:42 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 2017-10-25 20:36, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:44:17 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

[...files matching regex /reg_[^c].*\.mst/ correspond to 
"illustration_reg.xsl"...]

> GC> (If so, I think I'll rename them to begin with 'ill_reg_'.)
> 
>  Hmm, wouldn't this make them inconsistent with all the others? After all,
> they're illustrations too, so why don't they merit the "ill_" prefix?

In our jargon, actually, no. Illustrations are governed by one of
 - the NAIC illustration reg
 - the customary FINRA (formerly known as NASD) rules
 - Regulation D
so "reg_d" and "ill_reg" are customary jargon for two distinct
regulations. Jargon is not always lexically consistent, but its
meaning is immediately clear to specialists.

>  But, in any case, the answer to your question is affirmative. To be
> totally complete, I'd just like to add that this naming convention is just
> that, a convention, and illustration classes in C++ don't impose it. You do
> need to change the templates name in that code if you rename the files,
> however.

Okay, thanks for pointing out a trap I might well have stumbled into.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]