Re: [lmi] Integer overflow warnings in bourn_cast with clang

[Greg Chicares]

On 2017-04-07 13:50, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:31:25 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> GC> Let me decompose the implementation into four separate function templates
> GC> so that clang can compile it and we can then reexamine this.
> 
>  Just to be clear: the difference in test results is due solely to
> architecture, not compiler. I.e. it's not clang-specific, all versions of
> g++ (4, 5, 6) also pass the tests with my original "fix" in 64 bits but
> fail them in 32 bits.

Does commit b87d1dde7b63482b872bffeb998f711f37d4d08a fix all the
unexpected test failures?