Re: [lmi] Safe to assume std::uint64_t is available?

[Vadim Zeitlin]

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:09:35 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:

GC> Vadim--Does the patch below seem good to you? (Here, apparently the
GC> borland workaround was preferable to the code we were using for gcc.)

 Yes, we can rely on uint64_t being available on all supported platforms in
practice.

GC> I hesitate only because the exact-width integer types are optional
GC> [18.4.1]. This section of the code is for msw only; would any C++11
GC> (or more modern) compiler targeting msw really fail to provide uint64_t?

 Not IME and we already use uint64_t in rate_table.cpp, apparently without
any problems.

 Regards,
VZ