Re: [lmi] Clang fixes

[Greg Chicares]

On 2016-03-26 00:27, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:26:17 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> GC> But I'm not convinced that progress_meter::display_mode_ is fundamentally
> GC> a wrong idea, or that it can never be useful, so I'm reluctant to spend 
> the
> GC> time and effort to root it out and rewrite the documentation.
> 
>  I understand this and don't propose to do it.
> 
> GC> Therefore, is there a way to tell Clang that its objection is noted,
> GC> but we've decided not to take its advice?
> 
>  There are plenty of ways to do it, starting from the direct one of just
> disabling this warning with a clang-specific pragma to pretending that we
> do use it, as you propose, but I don't like doing this at all.

Sorry, to me, it's like performing an appendectomy without medical need:
it's not diseased, and I'm not willing to remove it. But we need to move
past this clang obstacle, so I committed the change I proposed earlier.