[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository
From: |
Greg Chicares |
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:00:47 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
On 2016-03-07 22:36, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2016-03-07 18:15, Greg Chicares wrote:
> [...]
>> Copy the inline patch between the "8<" scissors lines to the clipboard
>> in whatever way your email program does that. Then paste it into a file:
>>
>> cat >/opt/lmi/proprietary-patches/in/first.patch
>> [paste from clipboard]
>> [press Ctrl-D]
>
> BTW, this doesn't work for me due to icedove-38.5.0 breakage. I accepted
> a security update that brought this collateral damage:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1193153
> which means spaces get lost when pasting from email.
In case anyone else has that problem, I'm attaching both patches.
Neither contains any proprietary information.
- [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/07
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Vadim Zeitlin, 2016/03/07
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/07
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/08
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Murphy, Kimberly, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Vadim Zeitlin, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Vadim Zeitlin, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Vadim Zeitlin, 2016/03/10
- Re: [lmi] Proposed workflow for proprietary repository, Greg Chicares, 2016/03/11