Re: [lmi] actuarial tables format (was Re: Terse list of valuable projects)

[Václav Slavík]

On 22 Mar 2012, at 12:37, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> won't argue for one or the other format, but I just think that being
> explicit is rather an advantage compared to implicitly numbering the rows
> and not a problem.

You do have a point. Plus, it's moot anyway: as I said, I chose major and minor 
axes wrongly and once corrected, explicitly numbered rows are the only 
realistic option.

Vaclav