[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast
From: |
Vadim Zeitlin |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:27:02 +0200 |
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:24:40 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
GC> On 2008-06-13 01:54Z, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
GC> [...]
GC> > Notice that I decided to use boost::is_arithmetic<> instead of continuing
GC> > to use std::numeric_limits<>
GC>
GC> Already changed in HEAD; but....
GC>
GC> > after applying remove_const<> to FromDeref
GC> > type because the former seems more natural to me and because I thought
that
GC> > "boost::remove_const<typename boost::remove_reference<From> >" was a bit
GC> > clumsy
GC> [...]
GC> > + typedef typename boost::remove_reference<From>::type FromDeref;
GC>
GC> On 20080626T1709Z I committed the remainder of this patch, except
GC> for 'FromDeref'--is it necessary?
I think it was (and for g++ 4.1, not MSVC, although maybe MSVC needed it
too but I didn't test the version without it with it) but I'll need to
merge the latest cvs HEAD with my tree to be able to retest it and confirm
it.
Regards,
VZ
- Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Vadim Zeitlin, 2008/06/01
- Re[3]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Vadim Zeitlin, 2008/06/02
- Re: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Greg Chicares, 2008/06/02
- Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Vadim Zeitlin, 2008/06/22
- Re: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Greg Chicares, 2008/06/26
- Re: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Greg Chicares, 2008/06/26
- Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast,
Vadim Zeitlin <=
- Re[2]: [lmi] passing objects instead of references to value_cast, Vadim Zeitlin, 2008/06/30