Re: [lmi] a less trivial patch: don't use deprecated MakeDefaultName() + refactoring

[Greg Chicares]

On 2008-06-02 07:59Z, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:52:36 +0000 Greg Chicares <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> GC> Here's a rough sketch of a proposal
> GC>   http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2008-03/msg00038.html
> GC> to make wxDocument::m_documentParent actually useful. Is there
> GC> any objection to that in principle?
> 
>  I don't think so, it seems perfectly fine to me and while I'd prefer to
> post to wx-dev before implementing this proposal I don't see any reasons
> anyone would object to it.

Great, thanks.

>  The question for me is whether LMI
> 
> a) can wait for wx 2.9 or even 3.0
> b) can use a patched wx 2.8 version
> c) needs another workaround for the problem (B) working with pristine 2.8
> 
> ?

It can wait a while longer. Sometime in 2008 would be optimal
for (a) or (b). I suspect that (c) would be harder than (b).