Re: [lmi] Upgrading gcc [Was: callback.hpp vs boost::function]

[Greg Chicares]

On 2005-10-31 4:36 UTC, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2005-10-30 23:02 UTC, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> 
> Are you running 'make unit_tests' as well as building the wx target?
> I see 37 out of 40 unit-test targets passing with gcc-3.4.2

Correction: that should have been
  thirty-eight out of forty-one unit-test targets pass with MinGW gcc-3.4.2

Furthermore:
  thirty-five  out of forty-one unit-test targets pass with como-4.3.3
    [with mingw gcc as the underlying C compiler]
  nineteen     out of forty-one unit-test targets pass with borland-5.5.1

What primary toolset are TT-Solutions using--is it cygwin now, or GNU/Linux?
It would be interesting to know what statistic you get with your toolset
when you run
  make unit_tests 2>/dev/null | grep -c 'no errors detected'
whenever it's convenient--this isn't urgent.