[lmi-commits] [6408] Regularize layout; move a comment block

[Greg Chicares]

Revision: 6408
          http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=lmi&revision=6408
Author:   chicares
Date:     2015-11-14 12:27:53 +0000 (Sat, 14 Nov 2015)
Log Message:
-----------
Regularize layout; move a comment block

Modified Paths:
--------------
    lmi/trunk/ihs_avmly.cpp

Modified: lmi/trunk/ihs_avmly.cpp
===================================================================
--- lmi/trunk/ihs_avmly.cpp     2015-11-14 12:26:28 UTC (rev 6407)
+++ lmi/trunk/ihs_avmly.cpp     2015-11-14 12:27:53 UTC (rev 6408)
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
         ,CashValueFor7702()
         );
 
-    NetPmts[Month]   = 0.0; // TODO ?? expunge as being unnecessary
+    NetPmts  [Month] = 0.0; // TODO ?? expunge as being unnecessary
     GrossPmts[Month] = 0.0; // TODO ?? expunge as being unnecessary
     TxExch1035();
     // TODO ?? TAXATION !! Is this where spec amt should be increased by GPT?
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
     // contracts. We deem net payments to have the same proportion
     // as gross payments, which we do have for ee and er separately.
 
-    HOPEFULLY(0.0 <= GrossPmts[Month]);
+    HOPEFULLY(0.0 <=   GrossPmts[Month]);
     HOPEFULLY(0.0 <= EeGrossPmts[Month]);
     HOPEFULLY(0.0 <= ErGrossPmts[Month]);
 
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@
 
     HOPEFULLY(Year == InforceYear);
     HOPEFULLY(Month == InforceMonth);
-    HOPEFULLY(0.0 == GrossPmts[Month]);
+    HOPEFULLY(0.0 ==   GrossPmts[Month]);
     HOPEFULLY(0.0 == EeGrossPmts[Month]);
     HOPEFULLY(0.0 == ErGrossPmts[Month]);
 
@@ -1241,6 +1241,23 @@
 
     HOPEFULLY(materially_equal(GrossPmts[Month], EeGrossPmts[Month] + 
ErGrossPmts[Month]));
 
+    // Guideline limits are imposed in the order in which payments are
+    // applied:
+    //   1035 exchanges
+    //   employee vector-input premium
+    //   employer vector-input premium
+    //   dumpin
+    // This order is pretty much arbitrary, except that 1035 exchanges
+    // really must be processed first. An argument could be made for
+    // changing the order of employee and employer premiums. An
+    // argument could be made for grouping dumpin with employee
+    // premiums, at least as long as we treat dumpin as employee
+    // premium. Even though dumpin and 1035 exchanges are similar in
+    // that both are single payments notionally made at issue, it is
+    // not necessary to group them together: 1035 exchanges have a
+    // unique nature that requires them to be recognized before any
+    // premium is paid, and dumpins do not share that nature.
+
     if(Solving || mce_run_gen_curr_sep_full == RunBasis_)
         {
         if(ee_pay_this_month)
@@ -1254,7 +1271,7 @@
                 Irc7702_->ProcessGptPmt(Year, eepmt, fake_cum_pmt);
                 }
             EeGrossPmts[Month] += eepmt;
-            GrossPmts[Month] += eepmt;
+            GrossPmts  [Month] += eepmt;
             }
         if(er_pay_this_month)
             {
@@ -1267,29 +1284,13 @@
                 Irc7702_->ProcessGptPmt(Year, erpmt, fake_cum_pmt);
                 }
             ErGrossPmts[Month] += erpmt;
-            GrossPmts[Month] += erpmt;
+            GrossPmts  [Month] += erpmt;
             }
         }
 
     HOPEFULLY(materially_equal(GrossPmts[Month], EeGrossPmts[Month] + 
ErGrossPmts[Month]));
     HOPEFULLY(GrossPmts[Month] < 1.0e100);
 
-    // Guideline limits are imposed in this order:
-    //   1035 exchanges
-    //   employee vector-input premium
-    //   employer vector-input premium
-    //   dumpin
-    // This order is pretty much arbitrary, except that 1035 exchanges
-    // really must be processed first. An argument could be made for
-    // changing the order of employee and employer premiums. An
-    // argument could be made for grouping dumpin with employee
-    // premiums, at least as long as we treat dumpin as employee
-    // premium. Even though dumpin and 1035 exchanges are similar in
-    // that both are single payments notionally made at issue, it is
-    // not necessary to group them together: 1035 exchanges have a
-    // unique nature that requires them to be recognized before any
-    // premium is paid, and dumpins do not share that nature.
-
     if(0 == Year && 0 == Month && (Solving || mce_run_gen_curr_sep_full == 
RunBasis_))
         {
         // Don't enforce the GPT premium limit when solving for
@@ -1300,8 +1301,9 @@
             Irc7702_->ProcessGptPmt(Year, Dumpin, fake_cum_pmt);
             }
         EeGrossPmts[Month] += Dumpin;
-        GrossPmts[Month] += Dumpin;
+        GrossPmts  [Month] += Dumpin;
         }
+
     HOPEFULLY(materially_equal(GrossPmts[Month], EeGrossPmts[Month] + 
ErGrossPmts[Month]));
 }