listhelper-moderate
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

lilypond-user post from address@hidden requires approval


From: lilypond-user-owner
Subject: lilypond-user post from address@hidden requires approval
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:11:46 -0400

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

    List:    address@hidden
    From:    address@hidden
    Subject: RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score
    Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

    http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admindb/lilypond-user
        
to approve or deny the request.
--- Begin Message --- Subject: RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:11:00 -0700
If you mean this is the answer:

"When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar numbering will be 
off."

I already found that out from reading the  manual, but I am trying to figure 
out a work-around.  Also, what about the notion of the part sheets showing mm 
rests while the conductor score just shows empty measures? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 1:57 PM
> To: Dewdman42
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score
> 
> If you read the section on "Rests" in the users manual, it 
> tells you to 
> look in the section called "Multimeasure rests"
> for whole measure rests, which should answer your question.
> 
>     /Mats
> 
> Quoting Dewdman42 <address@hidden>:
> 
> >
> > I have come up with my own way to hide whole measure rests 
> from the conductor
> > score, while displaying them for the parts, but I would 
> like to hear if
> > there is a generally accepted better way of handling this, 
> as my way feels a
> > little complicated.  I'm trying to have it so that I have 
> only definition of
> > the actual note data and then the part and score are 
> formatted differently
> > from the same note data.
> >
> > Basically I defined a couple "macros" such as
> >
> >     wholeRest = {s1}
> >
> > Then when creating my voice data I use that macro:
> >
> >     myVoice = \newVoice { relative c' {| \wholeRest | c d e 
> f | \wholeRest
> > | }}
> >
> > When I produce the Part score for that player I would then 
> change the
> > wholeRest definition to {r1}
> >
> > So that works pretty well, but I am wondering if there is 
> an easier way to
> > begin with, and then also since I am going to want to have 
> multi-measure
> > rests for the parts, that brings up another question, which 
> is how I could
> > have one set of voice data that feeds both part and score, 
> and the part
> > version has a multi-measure rest, while the score version 
> just has empty
> > measures.
> >
> > Perhaps I need to use some kind of parallel, merged voices 
> strategy that is
> > not too complicated?
> >
> > Please forgive me if these are naive questions.  I am just 
> starting out with
> > Lilypond and I have been pouring through the manual for the 
> past couple days
> > trying to figure this stuff out myself, but a few things are not too
> > straightforward.
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: 
> > 
> http://www.nabble.com/Hiding-whole-measure-rests-from-conducto
> r-score-tf4045659.html#a11491939
> > Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at 
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
> 
> 
> 
>



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: confirm ed89553e53b5c80f177b012ea04a60c812d2af6e
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]